Sporting criticizes penalties for the Portuguese Cup final against Benfica: “They jeopardize the integrity of the competitions”

The Lions publicly criticize the Disciplinary Council’s rulings following the final against Benfica and question transparency, fairness, and rival treatment.

Sporting CP has launched a scathing criticism of the Portuguese Football Federation’s (FPF) Disciplinary Council over recent suspensions following the heated Taça de Portugal final against Benfica. In a strongly worded official statement released on Tuesday (July 15), the club expressed deep dissatisfaction with what it describes as inconsistent, unfair, and politically charged decisions that “jeopardize the integrity of the competitions.”

Matheus Reis Gets Five Games, Club Demands Answers

The disciplinary spotlight was placed on Matheus Reis, who received a five-match suspension for stepping on Benfica striker Andrea Belotti and for remarks made near the team bus. Sporting questioned the severity of the punishment and the process itself, especially considering it stemmed from video evidence submitted by Benfica.

But what truly raised eyebrows at Alvalade was the inclusion of confidential player contracts in the disciplinary case:

“Why are confidential contracts of players like Matheus Reis, Gyökeres, Hjulmand, and Geovany Quenda being attached to a case built on a video complaint?” asked the club.

Varandas Suspended, But Rivals Go Unpunished?

Another sore point is the suspension of Sporting president Frederico Varandas, who was barred from attending the Cup final in the technical area. The club contrasted this with what it sees as double standards applied to rival clubs:

• Benfica president allegedly confronted the FPF president at Jamor – no disciplinary action.
• Porto president accused Varandas of “coercing referees” – no disciplinary action.

“The facts and their disparity speak for themselves,” the statement said bluntly, highlighting perceived bias and selective justice.

Sporting Defends Its President

Sporting also defended Varandas’s conduct during the suspension period, pointing to his public support for the team and respectful behavior, including during ceremonies at Lisbon City Hall.

The club implied that his suspension and broader treatment are not only disproportionate but also part of a concerning pattern that undermines the credibility of sports justice in Portugal.

“A Letter With Incendiary Potential”

This strongly worded statement adds fuel to an already tense relationship between Portugal’s ‘Big Three’ clubs Sporting, Benfica, and Porto and the Disciplinary Council.

“These decisions call into question the integrity of the competitions and the credibility of sports justice,” the letter concludes.

With the 2025/26 season approaching, the aftermath of the Portuguese Cup final looks set to continue dominating headlines and stoking rivalries.